Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Main subject
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Psychol Trauma ; 2023 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2322198

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study's purpose was to develop an understanding of factors affecting moral distress among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: California-licensed, registered nurses who cared for COVID-19 patients for at least 3 months were recruited for an explanatory concurrent mixed methods study. Data are derived from the first of two surveys administered 3 months apart, including open-ended questions. RESULTS: Variables with significant bivariate correlations were included as simultaneous predictors in a linear regression model predicting moral distress. The overall model was significant, explaining a substantial portion of the variance in moral distress, but results showed only organizational support and institutional betrayal uniquely predicted moral distress. Three qualitative themes were identified: Ethical Violations in Care, Institutional Betrayal, and Traumatic Strain. The impacts of organizational support and institutional betrayal on nurses' moral distress are important findings in both datasets. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide insights into how nurses' experiences affected their feelings about work. Participants indicated feeling disregarded by management and institutional structures, indicating potential means of slowing the rates at which nurses plan to leave bedside practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

2.
American Nurse Today ; 17(6):55-55, 2022.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1897876
3.
J Infus Nurs ; 45(1): 41-48, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1583944

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has tested nurse staffing and other resources necessary for lifesaving treatment. The emergency use authorization in November 2020 of bamlanivimab as monotherapy and casirivimab/imdevimab as combination therapy brought hope to many as an option for outpatients at risk for severe illness. However, logistical concerns were soon revealed, because safe administration requires a location where patients can receive specialized care and monitoring for a period of 2 hours. This type of therapy would normally be offered at an outpatient infusion center. These centers often serve persons who are immunocompromised, and introducing COVID-19-positive individuals could threaten the safety of this population. This article describes the deployment of an emergency department-embedded infusion center set up for the purpose of supporting community members and providers electing for this treatment option.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL